Page 10 of 14: businesses ranked 901-1000 of 1316. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.
One reviewer received a full roof replacement with timely, clean work and direct owner access. Another paid for services never rendered and faced refusal to refund, escalating to small claims court. Evidence is limited to two reviews spanning years with conflicting outcomes.
Most jobs finish quickly with debris fully cleared. Insurance support and professional service stand out, though one reviewer questioned warranty coverage and workmanship on their roof.
Review evidence is too limited to assess this business's roofing work. Only one review text is available, which contains no substantive detail.
Quality varies significantly. Some clients report thorough, professional work with excellent communication; others experienced incomplete repairs, dismissed callbacks, unauthorized cost overruns of $4,000, and property damage from subcontractors. Written contracts recommended before signing.
Limited evidence: one five-star review praising quick storm damage assessment and neighborly conduct. One one-star review details a five-month collapse in service, unresponsiveness, missed deadlines, and disputed deposit refund after no work was performed. Reviews reflect extreme polarization with no middle ground.
One long-term customer praised fair pricing and accessibility, but another reported seven roofs installed in 2008 are failing early and that Bates declined to help with manufacturer claims, leaving them to seek assistance elsewhere.
One reviewer praised on-time, professional work at fair rates; another experienced significant quality failures across two major projects, with incomplete work and persistent water damage despite repeated promises of correction.
Atlanta Roofing Construction finishes jobs fast with crews that show up on time and work cleanly, but a pattern of poor follow-up on warranty claims and recurring leaks mars the record. Named crew members like Miguel, Rodney, and Kevin have built strong upfront reputations, yet customers report disconnected phone lines and unanswered emails when problems emerge post-installation.
Most recent praise centers on Mr. Raborn's hands-on repair work and straightforward honesty, especially with fascia, soffits, and leak diagnosis. One older complaint flagged contract fine-print as a point of friction.
Both reviewers praised the work and service. One highlighted Artie's helpfulness and kindness; another noted careful cleanup of debris after the roof job.
Anderson & Sons Roofing does quality work backed by warranty and follow-up checks, with reasonable pricing noted. One older complaint about property damage during a job and unresolved compensation remains on the record.
Eric Ericson and his team earn praise for speed, direct communication, and fair pricing; multiple reviewers report same-day or next-day service and thorough upfront explanation. However, two early one-star reviews cite serious installation errors on roof and gutter work, including misaligned gutters causing water damage and improper shingle placement, suggesting quality control issues despite strong recent track record.
Three five-star reviews praise Samples Roofing for cedar expertise and punctuality, with one reviewer calling them "the best cedar shake roofer in the entire state." A detailed one-star review from 2019 documents months of missed appointments and unresolved leaks, citing poor responsiveness after payment. Mixed track record with specialist work versus service reliability.
Both five-star reviews praise quick, dependable work and leak repairs. Evidence is limited to two reviews spanning four years.
Valley Components delivers solid roof replacements in Columbus with reliable service and fair pricing. Limited recent review activity makes it hard to gauge current operations.
One reviewer praised Joshua Bruno for fast work and cleanup after hail damage. Another flagged door-to-door solicitation in a no-solicitation area as a concern about the business's ethics.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
FNS Construction has two distinct customer experiences. When they complete work, clients consistently praise quality repairs, metal roofing installations, careful cleanup, and fair pricing. However, multiple complaints detail unresponsiveness, abandoned projects, and deposits not returned despite no work performed.
Evidence is limited: two reviews question whether the business still operates and criticize field behavior; one praises insurance navigation and one-day roof replacement. Rating is 3.0 across 4 reviews with 50% five-star and 50% one/two-star splits.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Five-star reviews praise professional work and honest dealing, though two older one-star reviews cite missed estimate appointments and ignored calls. Evidence is thin and split across a long span; recent activity is unclear.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Amazing Grace Roofing and Contracting operates in Warner Robins with a 2.7-star rating across 3 Google reviews. Review evidence is limited; no individual review text is available to assess service quality or specific experiences.
Positive reviews praise flooring, bathroom, and interior renovation work with punctual completion. Serious complaints center on Casey (a named employee/representative) over payment disputes, unprofessional behavior online, and unresolved roof leaks after installation with disputed or missing warranty documentation. Recent reviews and one five-star for roofing contrast sharply with two unresolved one-star roof complaints from 2018-2019.
Ala Roofing's 2.6-star rating reflects a stark divide: five-star reviews from 2013-2015 describe professional, responsive work at fair prices; more recent reviews (past 4 years) allege nonresponse after deposit, missed appointments, and unresolved refund requests. Multiple complaints reference pending lawsuits and owner name changes across business entities.
Vertex Roofing has a mixed track record marked by significant gaps in execution. While some jobs finish on schedule and staff show up punctually, widespread complaints center on roofs leaking shortly after install, improper shingle placement and valley installation, and refusal to honor warranty claims or return calls for fixes.
Tight Line Exteriors has a stark split: older five-star reviews praise professional crews and solid workmanship, but more recent one-star reviews cite months-long delays, vanished sales follow-up, and refusal to address failed installations. The business no longer appears active.
Five-star reviews credit the team with professional work and solid installations, but one-star reviews describe unresponsiveness to repeated calls, botched jobs that other roofers had to correct, and refusal to engage after payment. Evidence is thin and spread across 7-8 years.
Most recent feedback (from 6 years ago) is polarised. One account describes a no-show with no callback; another praises punctuality, clear communication, and a follow-up call after fast, clean work. Limited recent evidence; current performance unclear.
Long-standing customers praise the company for roof repairs on century-old homes and honouring warranties. Earlier no-show incidents and communication lapses raise caution.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
One recent reviewer praised the owner's roofing skills highly. An older complaint cited repeated broken appointments and no-show service calls, leading the customer to switch contractors.
One five-star review praised fast completion, material upgrades, and meticulous cleanup on a full roof replacement. A one-star review from two years ago raised concerns about reckless driving by a company vehicle. Limited recent evidence.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Between 2018 and 2019, many five-star reviews praised Donnie Tran's team for fast, professional roof and gutter work, insurance help, and cleanup. However, multiple one-star reviews from the same period allege deposit theft ($15,000 to $30,000), unlicensed work, no-shows, property damage, and failure to complete projects, leaving homes unlivable. The business appears in active litigation.
Two one-star reviews describe abandoned roof work (deposit claimed but no installation completed), unresponsiveness to contact, and equipment left behind. Personal conduct concerns also raised.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Most reviews praise quick, professional leak repair and fair prices, but one customer reports that EB and Randy failed to return for warranty work after basement leaks recurred. Evidence is limited to four reviews spanning nine years.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Reviewers report a sharp divide: some praise fast, fairly priced storm damage repairs with same-day inspections, while others describe missed insurance appointments, shifting estimates, and incomplete follow-up. Evidence is limited by small review volume and age.
One review flags unsafe driving by company vehicle on I-20. Evidence is extremely limited; no feedback on actual roofing work or customer service.
Five-star reviewers call Walton reliable and skilled, noting warranty coverage. However, older complaints cite unsafe practices including near-misses with materials, rude responses to safety concerns, and unsecured tools left on site. Rating spread is wide: 63% five-star against 25% one/two-star.
Two reviews praise professional work at fair prices, with prompt estimates and warranty backing. One review expresses strong dissatisfaction but provides no detail about the work itself.
Both reviewers praise honest dealing and fair pricing. Richard is named as a trusted technician customers call back repeatedly for repairs and replacements.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Two five-star reviews praise Recovery Roofing for keeping promises, clear communication, and fast response to emergency roof damage from a fallen tree. A one-star complaint alleges theft during a snow removal job, creating a serious caveat about trust.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
One reviewer reported the business took their call and then posted the requested work on Angi's list without permission. Review evidence is limited to a single one-star account.
Recent work impresses with fast turnaround, fair pricing, and meticulous cleanup after storm damage. However, an older complaint about poor quality and debris suggests inconsistent execution across jobs.
Three reviews span a wide range: two describe polished work and respectful communication from staff named Ali and James, with timely job completion and fair costs. A one-star complaint from a year ago alleges unpaid refund and unfinished work, unresolved since posting.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Five-star reviews praise field technicians for speed and friendliness, but one-star complaints dominate, centering on the owner's hostile phone manner: hanging up, refusing to listen, and sending fake invoices to clients who never hired him. The gap between field work and front-office conduct is stark. Review evidence is limited in volume but consistent in tone across older and recent submissions.
Bedingfield Roofing has delivered professional roof work under owner Terrance Bedingfield's direct involvement. A serious complaint about reckless driving by a company vehicle clouds the overall picture.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Six reviews split evenly between five-star and one/two-star ratings. Older positive reviews praised professionalism and pleasant staff. Multiple recent complaints from subcontractors and contractors report unpaid invoices, bad checks, and lack of communication from owner Algernon Brewster. Limited current review evidence available.
Work quality varies, but follow-through is unreliable. Multiple reviewers report unanswered calls for weeks, missed appointments, and work left incomplete even after payment. One job took months to return to; another was abandoned mid-project.
One customer praised their roof replacement as professional and timely with excellent cleanup. Another reported a post-installation leak around the chimney that required repeated contact attempts to resolve, leaving them frustrated after paying for a full roof.
Two one-star reviews from a decade ago describe serious problems: leaks persisting years after roof replacement, use of cheap materials, improper installation, and delays. One reviewer mentions a court case in Warner Robins magistrate court. No recent reviews are available to assess current performance.
Last updated 2026-08-26