
CentiMark Corporation
The single available review cites unwanted sales calls despite being on a do-not-call list.
Page 10 of 12: businesses ranked 901-1000 of 1198. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.

The single available review cites unwanted sales calls despite being on a do-not-call list.

All five-star reviews on record. Luis, the inspector, diagnosed leaky roof and siding issues clearly, offered repair options without overselling, and set realistic expectations about roof lifespan. Customers report professional service and readiness to return.
Older positive reviews praise the leadership and work quality on commercial roofs. Recent reviews describe delays in responding to customer calls and unresolved leaks after projects complete, leaving some clients frustrated.

Alphonso and his team fixed a leak with attention to detail and provided before/during/after photos. Work was fast, clean, and reasonably priced.

Two five-star reviews praise speed, quality, and skilled work by technician Rich. Limited review evidence, but both cite strong communication and fair pricing.

All six reviews praise New Hope Contracting for quality work, fair pricing, and Travis's hands-on approach. Reviewers completed projects ranging from deck extensions and screened rooms to porch builds and flooring, consistently citing professionalism, honest estimates, and stress-free experiences.

Most recent reviews report strong roof work and fair pricing, with several praising project managers Alex and Jorge by name. However, older review details and a detailed fraud complaint from a contractor describe payment issues, abandoned subcontractors, workplace injury claims, and poor site cleanup that raise serious business-practice concerns.

Most recent work earns five-star marks for speed and meeting customer specifications. An older complaint about job abandonment suggests scrutiny of contract terms and communication expectations remains warranted.

Clark and his crew deliver fast, owner-supervised roof work. Both five-star reviews highlight professional service and completion speed on damage restoration jobs.

Two five-star reviews from three years ago praise fast, professional work and strong follow-up. One reviewer completed a roof in a day and received help with insurance claims; another had a leak properly diagnosed and fixed with no recurrence.

James completed a large paint job (room, ceilings, trim) with a fair quote and quick start, earning repeat-customer confidence from the homeowner.

Both reviews praise fast completion and responsive service. David handled scheduling flexibly and kept communication open by phone and text. Work quality was consistently strong and sites were left clean.

Reviewers consistently praise the business as locally owned and operating for decades. Ratings cluster around five stars, with limited detail in available feedback.

The single detailed review on file praises upfront pricing and professional quality work on a new roof installation. Limited review evidence available.

Both reviewers praised the company for fixing roof leaks with professionalism and quality work. The limited review volume reflects early stage feedback, but the evidence supports consistent attention to detail and efficient execution.

Both five-star reviews praise Malone's for reliable, thorough work and strong management. Limited review evidence, but consistently positive.

Customers who completed roofing work report quality installations and fair pricing. However, the company's reputation is severely damaged by persistent unsolicited marketing texts and calls that continue even after requests to stop. Some negative reviews stem from scammers impersonating the business, but many legitimate complaints address the company's own aggressive contact practices.

Work gets done right and on time. Staff treat customers with respect, finish jobs thoroughly including cleanup, and stay focused on quality regardless of project size.

Bob Whitley and his team earned praise for professionalism, quick response, and getting jobs done without delays.

Most reviews are positive and highlight professional service and expertise with older metal roofs, including emergency work after Hurricane Michael. One older review noted poor callback responsiveness, though this was four years ago.
Two older five-star reviews praised insurance claim support and workmanship, but a recent one-star review raised concerns about company identity and a referral-based inspection process that did not suit the reviewer's needs. Evidence is limited across just 3 reviews spanning years.
Two five-star reviews praise fast work, responsive staff, and dependable management for both commercial and residential jobs. One one-star review questioned the business's attention to detail based on a parking lot observation, not a roofing job experience.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Blanchett's small review base reflects consistent five-star ratings for metal roof and roof replacement work. Reviewers praise Greg's team for professional conduct, careful property handling, and finish quality on roofing and related projects.

All five reviews are five-star, with reviewers praising the owner Luis for reliable, professional work and thorough leak inspections. Evidence is limited by review recency, but those available highlight fair pricing and quality repairs.

Two five-star reviews support a positive record for this Alpharetta-based commercial roofing firm. Limited review detail is available.

Both reviewers praise the quality of work on their roofs. Limited review evidence, but what exists is uniformly positive.

Roofing Stinson delivers strong roof replacement and insurance support when engaged, with several customers praising fair pricing, thorough cleanup, and staff like Tracy who guided them through the process. However, warranty issues and follow-up failures mark recent experiences. A 2022 installation leaked within months, with the owner reluctant to remedy it and later charging for repairs; another customer reported the company went silent after payment despite promises for additional work.

Steve's Remodeling has completed satisfactory roofing work for some customers but struggles with follow-up and warranty service. Reviewers note quality installations initially, yet several report months of unanswered calls about defects and warranty claims.
Past customers praise Augusta Roofing for thorough roof assessment, fair pricing, and office manager Carolyn's hands-on follow-up; however, recent reviews highlight serious difficulty reaching the company when warranty issues arise post-installation.

All five reviews rate this business at five stars. Reviewers cite quick diagnosis and repair of roof leaks, including cases where other contractors had failed to locate the problem.

All five reviews rate this business at five stars. Customers praise speed, honesty, and punctuality, with one reviewer naming Phil as straightforward and reliable.

Half the reviews praise Del Rio for affordability and solid initial workmanship, but the other half describe leaks that returned within months of roof replacement, followed by months of ignored requests and broken promises to return for repairs. One customer waited over a year with no resolution.

One reviewer praised Decatur Roofing for thorough inspection, fast completion (1 day), on-site cleanup, and follow-up verification before final invoice.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Two reviewers praised the owner's customer focus and reasonable deck pricing, plus attentive support staff. One contractor reported a serious conflict: agreed-upon pricing was not honored, the crew arrived late and rushed the job, and there were disputes over work credit.

SCI Roofing Atlanta holds a 5-star rating on Google, though review volume is limited. The business states it has 20+ years of experience serving metro Atlanta and surrounding counties with residential, commercial, and emergency roof work, supported by full licensing and insurance.

One long-standing customer praised BGM's courteous crew, prompt materials, and single-day roof replacement with no hidden fees. Another reports roof leaks years later and inability to reach the business for support.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Positive reviews praise the owner Chris for skilled work and reliability, but an older complaint cites a missed appointment and unanswered calls. The 6-review sample shows a split: 83% five-star versus 17% one/two-star, reflecting inconsistent client experience.

KC Roofing earns strong marks for rapid emergency response, skilled repairs, and professionalism. One reviewer noted pricing felt high relative to job duration, though others praised reasonable costs and punctuality.

Wait times dominate feedback: customers report 3 to 9 hours to load, with trucks queued into the street during peak hours. Older reviews praised quick loading and skilled staff, but recent reviews reveal systemic delays, overcrowding, and poor management communication. Recent complaints include false explanations for delays and unsafe parking conditions.

Five years of repeat jobs with no issues reported by loyal clients; Hans responds quickly and handles insurance reinstatement smoothly. But two one-star reviews document missed appointments and weeks of no-callback on a failed repair, creating real doubt about consistency.

One five-star review currently available for C3 - Classic City Coverings. The business operates in roof replacement and repair with a track record exceeding 10 years according to their website. Further review detail is limited.

One five-star review from five years ago praised the roof work completed. Very limited review evidence available.

Cross Roofing operates as a licensed, bonded, and insured contractor claiming service across Georgia since 1972. With a single five-star review on file, evidence of customer experience is limited.
One reviewer praised the company for excellent work and reliable follow-up calls. Limited review evidence available.

One recent customer praised cleanup and two roof replacements after storm damage. An older review flagged trouble reaching the owner and an unfulfilled promise to return for a follow-up visit. Evidence is limited by the small review count.

One reviewer praised quick work at fair cost with a respectful crew. Another reported months of delay reaching the contractor after booking, eventually taking the job elsewhere.

Most jobs finish quickly with debris fully cleared. Insurance support and professional service stand out, though one reviewer questioned warranty coverage and workmanship on their roof.

All three reviews praise The Roofing Man for arriving on schedule, delivering quality work, and fair pricing. Evelio and his crew earned strong recommendations for residential roof replacement.
Dennis and his team earned perfect five-star reviews for handling roof replacement and repairs with insurance claim support. Customers noted quick completion, thorough cleanup, and willingness to take on jobs other contractors refused.

One reviewer received a full roof replacement with timely, clean work and direct owner access. Another paid for services never rendered and faced refusal to refund, escalating to small claims court. Evidence is limited to two reviews spanning years with conflicting outcomes.

Review evidence is too limited to assess this business's roofing work. Only one review text is available, which contains no substantive detail.

One reviewer reported paying the owner Charles but receiving no follow-up communication and no callback. Review evidence is limited.

Atlanta Roofing Construction finishes jobs fast with crews that show up on time and work cleanly, but a pattern of poor follow-up on warranty claims and recurring leaks mars the record. Named crew members like Miguel, Rodney, and Kevin have built strong upfront reputations, yet customers report disconnected phone lines and unanswered emails when problems emerge post-installation.

Quality varies significantly. Some clients report thorough, professional work with excellent communication; others experienced incomplete repairs, dismissed callbacks, unauthorized cost overruns of $4,000, and property damage from subcontractors. Written contracts recommended before signing.
Most recent praise centers on Mr. Raborn's hands-on repair work and straightforward honesty, especially with fascia, soffits, and leak diagnosis. One older complaint flagged contract fine-print as a point of friction.

Limited evidence: one five-star review praising quick storm damage assessment and neighborly conduct. One one-star review details a five-month collapse in service, unresponsiveness, missed deadlines, and disputed deposit refund after no work was performed. Reviews reflect extreme polarization with no middle ground.

One long-term customer praised fair pricing and accessibility, but another reported seven roofs installed in 2008 are failing early and that Bates declined to help with manufacturer claims, leaving them to seek assistance elsewhere.

Both reviewers praised the work and service. One highlighted Artie's helpfulness and kindness; another noted careful cleanup of debris after the roof job.

Two satisfied customers praised on-time, in-budget work and skilled installation. One older complaint cited no callback from the owner; current responsiveness is unclear.

Eric Ericson and his team earn praise for speed, direct communication, and fair pricing; multiple reviewers report same-day or next-day service and thorough upfront explanation. However, two early one-star reviews cite serious installation errors on roof and gutter work, including misaligned gutters causing water damage and improper shingle placement, suggesting quality control issues despite strong recent track record.

Most recent feedback highlights fast responses and solid repair work. One older complaint cited delayed completion and price changes on a fence job, plus poor cleanup.

Andrew and the Vision team guide customers through roof and gutter work step by step, including help with insurance. Complete gutter installations happen in days, not weeks.

Three five-star reviews praise Samples Roofing for cedar expertise and punctuality, with one reviewer calling them "the best cedar shake roofer in the entire state." A detailed one-star review from 2019 documents months of missed appointments and unresolved leaks, citing poor responsiveness after payment. Mixed track record with specialist work versus service reliability.

One recent review reports poor responsiveness: a customer sent photos of a tin roofing inquiry but received no callback. An older five-star review praised same-day order fulfillment, but current evidence is thin and skewed toward poor communication.

Both five-star reviews praise quick, dependable work and leak repairs. Evidence is limited to two reviews spanning four years.

Kairos Roofing & Restoration holds a 5-star rating, though review evidence is limited to a single Google review. Their website states 20+ years in business and lists gutter services, roof repair and replacement, and inspections across Atlanta.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

FNS Construction has two distinct customer experiences. When they complete work, clients consistently praise quality repairs, metal roofing installations, careful cleanup, and fair pricing. However, multiple complaints detail unresponsiveness, abandoned projects, and deposits not returned despite no work performed.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Evidence is limited: two reviews question whether the business still operates and criticize field behavior; one praises insurance navigation and one-day roof replacement. Rating is 3.0 across 4 reviews with 50% five-star and 50% one/two-star splits.

Five-star reviews praise professional work and honest dealing, though two older one-star reviews cite missed estimate appointments and ignored calls. Evidence is thin and split across a long span; recent activity is unclear.

Amazing Grace Roofing and Contracting operates in Warner Robins with a 2.7-star rating across 3 Google reviews. Review evidence is limited; no individual review text is available to assess service quality or specific experiences.

Ala Roofing's 2.6-star rating reflects a stark divide: five-star reviews from 2013-2015 describe professional, responsive work at fair prices; more recent reviews (past 4 years) allege nonresponse after deposit, missed appointments, and unresolved refund requests. Multiple complaints reference pending lawsuits and owner name changes across business entities.

Positive reviews praise flooring, bathroom, and interior renovation work with punctual completion. Serious complaints center on Casey (a named employee/representative) over payment disputes, unprofessional behavior online, and unresolved roof leaks after installation with disputed or missing warranty documentation. Recent reviews and one five-star for roofing contrast sharply with two unresolved one-star roof complaints from 2018-2019.

Hometown Roofing shows wide variance across its five Google reviews. Some customers report solid work on roof repairs and reasonable estimates; others cite material problems, incomplete gutter jobs, and lack of response to follow-up requests.

Vertex Roofing has a mixed track record marked by significant gaps in execution. While some jobs finish on schedule and staff show up punctually, widespread complaints center on roofs leaking shortly after install, improper shingle placement and valley installation, and refusal to honor warranty claims or return calls for fixes.

Tight Line Exteriors has a stark split: older five-star reviews praise professional crews and solid workmanship, but more recent one-star reviews cite months-long delays, vanished sales follow-up, and refusal to address failed installations. The business no longer appears active.

Five-star reviews credit the team with professional work and solid installations, but one-star reviews describe unresponsiveness to repeated calls, botched jobs that other roofers had to correct, and refusal to engage after payment. Evidence is thin and spread across 7-8 years.

Most recent feedback (from 6 years ago) is polarised. One account describes a no-show with no callback; another praises punctuality, clear communication, and a follow-up call after fast, clean work. Limited recent evidence; current performance unclear.

One recent reviewer called the company trustworthy and reliable. An older review flagged it as lead-generation focused and questioned genuine follow-through on projects.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Last updated 2026-09-15